ABSTRACT
Background: The COVID 19 Pandemic has been an unprecedented global health crisis. We undertook a retrospective observational study to evaluate its impact on the management of hepatocellular cancer (HCC) in a large tertiary referral service in the UK offering all treatment modalities: liver transplantation and resection through to locoregional, systemic therapy and specialist palliative care. HCC in adults is often diagnosed in advanced stages as symptoms are only apparent later in the disease, and recent reviews have highlighted more patients presenting later with decompensation and a backlog of deferred care1. This study reviews outcomes pre and post the first wave of the Pandemic, including disease presentation, time to treatment and loss to follow up. Methods: Retrospective study of consecutive new referrals to a tertiary treatment centre. These included patients discussed between Dec 2019-Feb 2020 ('pre-COVID';total referrals n=98 with 66 newly diagnosed HCC), and July-Sept 2020 ('post 1st wave COVID';total referrals n=81 with 51 newly diagnosed HCC). NHS Providers had been asked to maintain access to essential cancer treatment throughout the Pandemic with easing of lockdown on 11 May 2020. Patients were longitudinally followed up and analysed using electronic medical records. Descriptive results were expressed as median with IQR for continuous data and as frequency (%) for categorical data. Baseline characteristics of patients were compared between the two cohorts using the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous data, and χ2 test for qualitative data. Results: As shown in Table 1, post 1st wave there has been a reduction in total number of referrals. Median age, sex and aetiology were similar between groups. Differences were noted in patient characteristics of the 'post 1st wave' cohort with a greater proportion presenting with Child Pugh C (19% vs 4%, p=0.037) and BCLC stage D (25.5% vs 12% p=0.019). Among the group of patients presenting during the Pandemic none had a diagnosis of COVID 19 infection. While there were no significant differences in loss to follow up or the decision to treatment time interval (excluding transplant) between 2019 & 2020 (p=0.672), 3 patients in 2020 had treatment cancellations due to capacity. Conclusion: After the 1st wave there has been a reduction in external referrals and an increase in number of patients presenting with advanced chronic liver disease and untreatable HCC. Whilst these are likely to represent the effects of major service reconfiguration during the Pandemic at both a 1° and 2° care level our study suggests we need to better understand medium to longterm impact. We note local efforts to preserve cancer care avoided treatment delays post 1st wave but further analysis is underway to assess impact of the second wave on quality of care received and mortality.
ABSTRACT
Background: Burnout is a syndrome defined by emotional exhaustion, depersonalisation and loss of personal accomplishment. It is a growing concern amongst doctors, particularly in oncology, who face the added stress of delivering life changing results to patients and managing end of life care. This has potential for negatively impacting mental health, job satisfaction and ultimately patient care. This has been compounded by the COVID-19 pandemic and the uncertainty around complex oncological treatment decisions, longer working hours, redeployment, and constant changes to working patterns to meet the evolving clinical need. In response to this, a novel wellbeing intervention was designed by the educational lead consultant and psychologists to prevent burnout during the pandemic. Methods: Junior doctors working at a single UK cancer centre during the COVID-19 pandemic were invited to attend weekly 30 minute wellbeing sessions facilitated by a clinical psychologist throughout their oncology placement (average 4-6 months). Sessions had an average attendance of 3-6 doctors and began with a 5 minute breathing and relaxation exercise followed by a mixture of clinical debriefing, reflective practice, and mindfulness strategies. Trainees were invited to have individual sessions if required. Surveys based on the 14 point Warwick Edinburgh Well Being Scale (WEMWBS) were conducted at the start and end of placement. Additional qualitative feedback was collated. Results:Throughout a 6 month period, 10 doctors participated in this study. Baseline WEMWBS scores revealed average mental wellbeing (n = 8), high mental wellbeing (n = 1) and probable depression (n = 1). Median baseline WEMWBS score was 52(41-62). Median number of sessions attended was 11(3-14). Post intervention, there was no significant deterioration in baseline WEMWBS score (mean change +2.2;p= 0.34). When doctors were asked about their optimism for the future, there was a significant increase by +0.4 points (p= 0.037). With respect to participant feedback, 100% were either 'satisfied' (n = 1) or 'very satisfied' (n = 9) with the group facilitation and 100% found the group sessions either 'helpful' (n = 7) or 'very helpful' (n = 3). Trainee feedback described the benefits of reflecting in a structured and safe environment, breathing exercises, and learning mindfulness strategies. Conclusions: Burnout is a serious concern amongst junior oncologists and is rising as a result of COVID-19. We present a novel intervention that promoted psychological flexibility and importantly maintained mental wellbeing throughout the pandemic. Further studies are planned to develop evidence based interventions to tackle this important issue.
ABSTRACT
Background: The provision of cancer services has been strongly impacted by the outbreak of SARS-CoV-2. Our Cancer Centre in South-East London treats approximately 8,800 patients annually and is one of the largest Comprehensive Cancer Centres in the UK. When dealing with the second wave of COVID-19, it is important to further evaluate the safety of cancer treatments whilst balancing the risks of COVID-19 infection and complications. Here, we report on the patient/tumour characteristics of those patients undergoing SACT for a urological cancer diagnosis during the first wave, so as to help establish clinical guidelines for the management of these patients in a SARS-CoV-2 epidemic. Methods: All urological cancer patients receiving at least one SACT between 1st March- 31st May 2020 (COVID-19 period) were compared to the same timeframe in 2019. SARSCoV2 infection was defined as a positive RT-PCR test;patients with symptoms or radiological changes alone were excluded. As part of Guy's Cancer Cohort, we collected information on demographics, and cancer type, stage, and treatment. Results: A total of 455 patients (305 prostate, 102 renal, 38 bladder, and 10 testicular) received SACT in 2020 as compared to 535 (353 prostate, 129 renal, 37 bladder, and 15 testicular) in 2019 (15% overall decline). Patient characteristics in terms of demographics were fairly comparable, with 10% female patients in 2019 and 9% in 2020;49% aged 70+ vs 45%;and 77% in the low socioeconomic category vs 78%. There was an increase in patients with stage 4 (89% vs 95% in 2020) and a slight change in distribution of SACT types (2019 vs 2020): chemotherapy (18% vs 14%), immunotherapy (7% vs 10%), biological or targeted (63% vs 66%), combination of biological/targeted (6% vs 5%), other combinations (5% vs 5%). The proportion of SACT delivered as part of radical treatment declined from 3% to 0.2% in 2020. A total of 5 patients (1%) developed COVID-19 (2 prostate, 2 renal, and 1 bladder). All were male and aged 60+;three had 2+ comorbidities. One patient was on immunotherapy and four on biological or targeted treatment. Four patients had severe pneumonia and one died of their COVID-19 (bladder cancer). Conclusions: Whilst there was a decline of number of patients receiving SACT during COVID-19, we were still able to provide a safe high-quality urological cancer SACT pathway during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, with very few COVID-19 positive patients. In a next step we will evaluate oncological outcomes at 6 months follow-up.